Background: With the transition from the contemporary (cTnI) to high-sensitivity troponin assay (hs-cTnI), concerns have arisen regarding the diagnostic differences between these two assays due to analytical distinctions. This study aims to evaluate the age and sex differences between these two assays, as well as the differences resulting from using two different 99th percentile values of the high-sensitivity troponin assay. Method: A retrospective observational study was conducted at an academic medical center, encompassing a total of 449 lithium heparin plasma samples included in the dataset. Both contemporary and high-sensitivity troponin were simultaneously measured using Siemens ADVIA Centaur analyzers. Two sets of sex-specific 99th percentile URLs from the Siemens study (cutoff-1) and Universal Sample Bank data (cutoff-2) were used for the data analysis. Results: The use of cutoff-1 or cutoff-2 had a negligible impact on troponin classification. Troponin elevation significantly increased in individuals > 50 years old for males and >40 years old for females, with both troponin assays. A receiver operating characteristic analysis did not find significant differences between the two assays. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences in survival in cTnI according to the non-sex-specific 99th URL or hs-cTnI (cutoff-2) but showed a slight difference in survival in hs-cTnI (cutoff-1). Conclusions: Overall, there were no significant differences in age and sex in the diagnostic performance between the contemporary and high-sensitivity troponin assays. Selection criteria for the establishment of the 99th percentile URL should be standardized to avoid the misinterpretation of the troponin results.
Keywords: age; contemporary; high sensitivity; hospitalized patients; sex; troponin.