Flow cytometry is commonly employed for ploidy determination and cell cycle analysis in cryptococci. The cells are subjected to fixation and staining with DNA-binding fluorescent dyes, most commonly with propidium iodide (PI), before undergoing flow cytometric analysis. In ploidy determination, cell populations are classified according to variations in DNA content, as evidenced by the fluorescence intensity of stained cells. As reported in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we found drawbacks with PI staining that confounded the accurate analysis of ploidy by flow cytometry when the size of the cryptococci changed significantly. However, the shift in the fluorescence intensity, unrelated to ploidy changes in cells with increased size, could be accurately interpreted by applying the ImageStream system. SYTOX Green or SYBR Green I, reported to enable DNA analysis with a higher accuracy than PI in S. cerevisiae, were nonspecific for nuclear DNA staining in cryptococci. Until dyes or methods capable of reducing the variability inherent in the drastic changes in cell size or shape become available, PI appears to remain the most reliable method for cell cycle or ploidy analysis in Cryptococcus.
Keywords: DAPI; Hoechst 33342; SYBR Green I; SYTOX Green; flow cytometry; imaging flowcytometry; ploidy determination; propidium iodide.