Point-of-care ultrasound for diagnosing extrapulmonary TB

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2024 May 1;28(5):217-224. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.23.0471.

Abstract

<sec id="st1"><title>BACKGROUND</title>Despite the high morbidity and mortality globally, standard microbiologic diagnosis for TB requires laboratory infrastructure inaccessible in many resource-limited areas and may be insufficient for identifying extrapulmonary disease. Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound facilitates visualization of extrapulmonary manifestations, permitting laboratory-independent diagnosis, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear.</sec><sec id="st2"><title>METHODS</title>We conducted a systematic review of five online databases for studies reporting ultrasound findings among cases with and without extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). A minimum of two authors independently screened and reviewed each article, and extracted data elements of interest. We conducted a series of univariate meta-analyses using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effect estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).</sec><sec id="st3"><title>RESULTS</title>Of 279 articles identified, 6 were included. There were 699 cases of EPTB among 1,633 participants. The pooled sensitivity estimate was 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.88). The pooled specificity estimate was 0.77 (95% CI 0.63-0.90). The pooled PPV and NPV estimates were respectively 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93).</sec><sec id="st4"><title>CONCLUSION</title>POC ultrasound showed modest test characteristics for diagnosing EPTB, which may constitute an improvement over some currently available diagnostics.</sec>.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Point-of-Care Systems*
  • Predictive Value of Tests*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity*
  • Tuberculosis* / diagnosis
  • Tuberculosis* / diagnostic imaging
  • Ultrasonography*