Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are the major components of long-chain per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), known for their chemical stability and environmental persistence. Even if PFOA and PFOS have been phased out or are limited in use, they still represent a concern for human and environmental health. Several studies have been performed to highlight the toxicological behavior of these chemicals and their mode of action (MoA). Data suggested the causal association between PFOA or PFOS exposure and carcinogenicity in humans, but the outcomes of epidemiological studies showed some inconsistency. Moreover, the hypothesized MoA based on animal studies is considered not relevant for human cancer. In order to improve the knowledge on PFAS toxicology and contribute to the weight of evidence for the regulatory classification of PFAS, we used the BALB/c 3T3 cell transformation assay (CTA), an in vitro model under consideration to be included in an integrated approach to testing and assessment for non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTxCs). PFOS and PFOA were tested at several concentrations by using a validated experimental protocol. Our results demonstrated that PFOA is not able to induce cell transformation, whereas PFOS exposure led to a concentration-related increase of type-III foci. Malignant foci formation is triggered at PFOS concentrations equal to or higher than 50 ppm. It is not directly associated with cytotoxicity or proliferation induction. The divergent CTA outcomes suggest that different molecular events could be responsible for the toxicological profiles of PFOS and PFOA, which were not completely captured in our study.
Keywords: PFAS; cell transformation assay; non-genotoxic carcinogenicity; perfluorooctane sulfonic acid; perfluorooctanoic acid.
This study explored PFOS and PFOA, common PFAS chemicals, to understand their potential harm and cancer risk. PFAS are known for their durability and resistance to heat, water and oil. They are persistent in the environment and may pose health risks despite decreased use. To better understand how PFOS and PFOA might be harmful, we conducted an in vitro test that can resemble the carcinogenesis process in experimental animals. Testing these chemicals on lab cells revealed PFOS can cause cancer-like changes, at levels of 50 parts per million or higher, but not PFOA. This difference suggests PFAS chemicals affect cells differently, but we need more research to understand exactly how they work and how they might cause cancer. Understanding this could help regulate and reduce PFAS harmful effects. Moreover, this research aligns with 3R principles by using cell-based tests as an alternative to animal testing, promoting ethical research practices.