Background and aim: This comparative prospective study was conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from August 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019 (six months). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intralesional chloroquine with intralesional meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Materials and methods: A total of 64 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria reporting to the Department of Dermatology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital were included in this study. Informed consent was taken and demographic data including patients' hospital registration number, age, gender, and number of lesions were noted. The subjects were randomly assigned into two groups. In group A, intralesional chloroquine was injected two times per week, and in group B, intralesional meglumine antimoniate was injected two times per week. The efficacy of both treatments was noted after eight weeks of treatment. Frequency and percentages were computed for qualitative variables like gender and number of lesions. Mean±standard deviation was presented for quantitative variables like age. Analysis was done to compare the proportion of both groups. Chi-square test was applied to compare the efficacy of both groups, p≤0.05 was taken as significant.
Results: In this study, the mean age of patients was 29.69±08.95 years. There were 63 (98.44%) males and one (1.56%) female. In this study, efficacy was achieved in six (18.8%) patients in group A, while in 17 (53.1%) patients in group B. This difference was statistically significant, i.e., p=0.004.
Conclusion: This study concluded that intralesional meglumine antimoniate is more effective in treating cutaneous leishmaniasis than intralesional chloroquine.
Keywords: antimoniate; chloroquine; cutaneous leishmaniasis; efficacy; intralesional.
Copyright © 2024, Ullah et al.