Comparison of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and dexamethasone implant monotherapy in treatment-naive eyes with diabetic macular edema: A 12-month real-life experience

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 1;72(Suppl 3):S453-S458. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2310_23. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and dexamethasone implant monotherapy in treatment-naive eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in real-life conditions.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were obtained from the hospital database of treatment-naive patients diagnosed with DME with at least 12 months of follow-up. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) at baseline, third month, sixth month, ninth month, and 12th month were recorded. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed based on having good (below 0.4 log of minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) or poor (0.4 logMAR and above) vision.

Results: A total of 219 eyes of 142 patients were included in the study. The change in the mean BCVA from baseline to 12th month was from 0.62 logMAR to 0.42 logMAR (P < 0.001) in the ranibizumab group, from 0.56 logMAR to 0.39 logMAR (P < 0.001) in the aflibercept group, and from 0.46 logMAR to 0.5 logMAR (P = 0.653) in the dexamethasone group. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups at any time point (P > 0.05). The mean amount of CRT change was statistically significant at 12 months in all groups (ranibizumab: -175.4 µm, aflibercept: -153.3 µm, dexamethasone: -71.4 µm) (P < 0.05). In eyes with initially good vision, the final BCVA at 12 months was significantly better in the ranibizumab group compared to the dexamethasone group (P = 0.008). The aflibercept group had better visual acuity than the dexamethasone group, but there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.059). There was no significant difference in final BCVA in eyes with initially poor vision. No serious ocular/systemic complications were noted.

Conclusion: At the 12th month, a significant decrease in CRT was achieved in all treatment groups, whereas only ranibizumab and aflibercept groups had a significant BCVA increase. In eyes with initially good vision, the final BCVA at 12 months was better in the ranibizumab group compared to the dexamethasone group, whereas it was similar in all groups having initially poor vision.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors* / administration & dosage
  • Dexamethasone* / administration & dosage
  • Diabetic Retinopathy* / complications
  • Diabetic Retinopathy* / diagnosis
  • Diabetic Retinopathy* / drug therapy
  • Drug Implants*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glucocorticoids* / administration & dosage
  • Glucocorticoids* / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Intravitreal Injections*
  • Macular Edema* / diagnosis
  • Macular Edema* / drug therapy
  • Macular Edema* / etiology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ranibizumab* / administration & dosage
  • Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor* / administration & dosage
  • Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor* / therapeutic use
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins* / administration & dosage
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins* / therapeutic use
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Visual Acuity*

Substances

  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins
  • Dexamethasone
  • aflibercept
  • Ranibizumab
  • Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
  • Drug Implants
  • Glucocorticoids
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A