Minimally invasive management of thoracic trauma: current evidence and guidelines

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Apr 15;9(Suppl 2):e001372. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001372. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Minimally invasive procedures are being increasingly proposed for trauma. Injuries to the chest wall and/or lung have historically been managed by drainage with a large bore thoracostomy tube, while cardiac injuries have mandated sternotomy. These treatments are associated with significant patient discomfort. Percutaneous placement of small 'pigtail' catheters was initially designed for drainage of simple pericardial fluid. Their use subsequently expanded to drainage of the pleural cavity. The role of pigtail catheters for primary treatment of traumatic pneumothorax and hemopneumothorax has increased, while their use for pericardial fluid after trauma remains controversial. Pericardial windows have alternatively been purposed as a minimally invasive treatment option for possible hemopericardium. The aim of this article is to review the current evidence and guidelines for minimally invasive management of chest trauma.

Keywords: cardiac surgical procedures; hemopneumothorax; thoracic injuries; thoracic surgical procedures.

Publication types

  • Review