Objectives: The primary focus of this research is the proposition of a methodological framework for the clinical application of the long coronavirus disease (COVID) Symptom and Severity Score (LC-SSS). This tool is not just a self-reported assessment instrument developed and validated but serves as a standardized, quantifiable means to monitor the diverse and persistent symptoms frequently observed in individuals suffering from long COVID.
Methods: A three-stage process was used to develop, validate, and establish scoring standards for the LC-SSS. Validation measures included correlations with other patient-reported measures, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's α for internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Scoring standards were determined using K-means clustering, with comparative assessments made against Hierarchical clustering and the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM).
Results: The LC-SSS showed correlations with EQ-5D-5L (rs = -0.55), EQ-VAS (rs = -0.368), PHQ-9 (rs = 0.538), BAI (rs = 0.689), and ISI (rs = 0.516), confirming its construct validity. Structural validity was good with a CFI of 0.969, with Cronbach's α of 0.93 indicating excellent internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was also satisfactory (ICC = 0.732). K-means clustering identified three distinct severity categories in individuals living with long COVID, providing a basis for personalized treatment strategies.
Conclusions: The LC-SSS provides a robust and valid tool for assessing long COVID. The severity categories established via K-means clustering demonstrate significant variation in symptom severity, informing personalized treatment and improving care quality for long COVID patients.
Keywords: cluster; long COVID; patient-reported outcome.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.