The effect of amplitude normalization technique, walking speed, and reporting metric on whole-body angular momentum and its interpretation during normal gait

Abstract

Whole-body angular momentum (WBAM) represents the cancellations of angular momenta that are produced during a reciprocal gait pattern. WBAM is sensitive to small changes and is used to compare dynamic gait patterns under different walking conditions. Study designs and the normalization techniques used to define WBAM vary and make comparisons between studies difficult. To address this problem, WBAM about each anatomical axis of rotation from a healthy control population during normal gait were investigated within four metrics: 1) range of WBAM, 2) integrated WBAM, 3) statistical parametric mapping (SPM), and 4) principal component analysis (PCA). These data were studied as a function of walking speed and normalization. Normalization techniques included: 1) no normalization, 2) normalization by height, body mass and walking speed, and 3) normalization by height, body mass and a scalar number, gravity×height, that is independent of walking velocity. Significant results were obtained as a function of walking speed regardless of normalization technique. However, the interpretation of significance within each metric was dependent on the normalization technique. Method 3 was the most robust technique as the differences were not altered from the expected relationships within the raw data. Method 2 actually inverted the expected relationship in WBAM amplitude as a function of walking speed, which skewed the results and their interpretation. Overall, SPM and PCA statistical methods provided better insights into differences that may be important. However, depending on the normalization technique used, caution is advised when interpreting significant findings when comparing participants with disparate walking speeds.

Keywords: Dynamic balance; Fall risk; Gait biomechanics.