Orthobiologics in delayed union and non-union of adult long bones fractures: A systematic review

Lorenzo Impieri; Andrea Pezzi; Henrique Hadad; Giuseppe M Peretti; Laura Mangiavini; Nicolò Rossi

doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101760

Orthobiologics in delayed union and non-union of adult long bones fractures: A systematic review

Bone Rep. 2024 Apr 6:21:101760. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101760. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Authors

Lorenzo Impieri¹, Andrea Pezzi¹, Henrique Hadad², Giuseppe M Peretti^{3

4}, Laura Mangiavini^{3

4}, Nicolò Rossi¹

Affiliations

¹ Residency Program in Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
² Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil.
³ Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
⁴ IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

Background: Fracture healing poses a significant challenge in orthopedics. Successful regeneration of bone is provided by mechanical stability and a favorable biological microenvironment. This systematic review aims to explore the clinical application of orthobiologics in treating aseptic delayed union and non-union of long bones in adults.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three databases were explored, with no date restrictions, using keywords related to orthobiologics and delayed union and non-union. Eligible studies included human clinical studies in English, with available full texts, examining orthobiologics such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and bone morphogenetic protein (BMPs) for treating aseptic delayed unions and non-unions in adults. Animal studies, in vitro research, and studies on non-unions due to congenital defects, tumors or infections were excluded.

Results: The initial search identified 9417 studies, with 20 ultimately included in the review. These studies involved 493 patients affected by non-union and 256 patients affected by delayed union, with an average age respectively of 40.62 years and 41.7 years. The mean follow-up period was 15.55 months for non-unions and 8.07 months for delayed unions. PRP was the most used orthobiologic, and outcomes were evaluated through time to union, functional scores, and clinical examinations. The results indicated that orthobiologics, especially PRP, tended to yield better outcomes compared to surgical procedures without biological factors.

Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that orthobiologics, such as PRP, BMPs, and MSCs, can be effective and safe in the management of delayed union and non-union fractures. These biological treatments have the potential to improve union rates, reduce healing times, and enhance functional outcomes in patients with non-union fractures. Further research is essential to refine treatment protocols and determine the most suitable orthobiologic for specific patient populations and fracture types.

Keywords: Bone healing; Delayed unions; Fractures; Non-union; Orthobiologics; PRP; Pseudoartrosis.

Publication types

Review