Performance characteristics of a polymerase chain reaction-based assay for the detection of EGFR mutations in plasma cell-free DNA from patients with non-small cell lung cancer using cell-free DNA collection tubes

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):e0295987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295987. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Survival rates in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are low. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in liquid biopsy (plasma) is increasingly used to identify targeted therapies for clinically actionable mutations, including EGFR mutations in NSCLC. The cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (cobas EGFR test) is FDA-approved for EGFR mutation detection in tissue or liquid biopsy from NSCLC. Standard K2EDTA tubes require plasma separation from blood within 4 to 8 hours; however, Roche Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) Collection Tubes (Roche cfDNA tube) enable whole blood stability for up to 7 days prior to plasma separation. This analysis assessed performance of Roche cfDNA tubes with the cobas EGFR test for the detection of EGFR mutations in plasma from healthy donors or patients with NSCLC. Overall, test performance was equally robust with either blood collection tube, eg, regarding limit of detection, linearity, and reproducibility, making Roche cfDNA tubes suitable for routine clinical laboratory use in this setting. Importantly, the Roche cfDNA tubes provided more flexibility for specimen handling versus K2EDTA tubes, eg, in terms of tube mixing, plasma separation, and sample stability, and do not require processing of blood within 8 hours thereby increasing the reach of plasma biopsies in NSCLC.

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / pathology
  • Cell-Free Nucleic Acids* / genetics
  • ErbB Receptors / genetics
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Lung Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Mutation
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Reproducibility of Results

Substances

  • Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
  • ErbB Receptors
  • EGFR protein, human

Grants and funding

The study funders include F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Roche Diagnostics International Ltd (Rotkreuz, Switzerland), Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., and AstraZeneca. The sponsor, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, contributed to the design of this analysis. Data collected by the authors were analyzed by employees at Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Authors employed by the study sponsor contributed to the conduct of the analysis; to the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and to the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript, as well as to the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Support in the form of salaries was provided for authors throughout the course of the study and during the preparation of the manuscript (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.: TM, HH, NL, SJ, SS [current affiliation Illumina], NS, and PO; AstraZeneca: AK, M Kohlmann, XL-S, and M Kiral [current affiliation Sanofi]; Roche Diagnostics: JL [current affiliation Genentech, Inc], BS). Research support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; additional editorial support was funded by Roche Diagnostics International Ltd (Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Other than the support declared above, these funders did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of the authors are articulated in the ‘Author Contributions’ section.