Aim: A rapid and precise diagnostic method is crucial for timely intervention and management of tuberculosis. The present study compared the diagnostic accuracy of a novel lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen test, AIMLAM, for tuberculosis in urine samples. Methodology: The study subjected 106 TB suspects to smear microscopy, MGIT, GeneXpert and AIMLAM. Results: Among 106, smear microscopy identified 36 as positive (33%) (sensitivity; 70.93%, 95% CI (60.14-80.22%), while MGIT showed 38 positive (36.8%). GeneXpert detected 59 positives (sensitivity; 96.83, 95% CI (89.00-99.61%)). AIMLAM declared 61 as positive (57.5%) (sensitivity; 100.00, 95% CI (94.13-100.00%) and 45 as negative (42.5%). Conclusion: Overall, AIMLAM demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy than GeneXpert Assay, smear microscopy and MGIT liquid culture in urine samples.
Keywords: AIMLAM; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TB; lipoarabinomannan.
This study describes a new way to detect tuberculosis, called AIMLAM. Unlike traditional methods that use sputum or blood, AIMLAM tests urine samples and bodily fluids. It is automated and uses easily accessible samples to identify a tuberculosis infection, so may be a convenient and noninvasive option for healthcare providers. The test shows promising results in terms of accuracy and sensitivity.