Early results of combined total ankle total talus replacement in the revision setting

Joyce En-Hua Wang; Jonathan Day; Julia McCann; Paul Cooper

doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.03.012

Early results of combined total ankle total talus replacement in the revision setting

Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Mar 26:S1268-7731(24)00071-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.03.012. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Joyce En-Hua Wang¹, Jonathan Day², Julia McCann³, Paul Cooper³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
² Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: jd1553@georgetown.edu.
³ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

PMID: 38584061
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.03.012

Abstract

Background: Revision of failed total ankle replacement (TAR) is challenging and associated with increased morbidity. Given the increased popularity of TAR in treating end-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA), viable revision options are needed. The objective of this case series is to present a minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of patient-specific custom 3D-printed total ankle total talus (TATR) prostheses in this unique subset of patients.

Methods: 19 participants with ESAA and failed primary TAR who underwent TATR by a single surgeon at our institution from 2019 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. All participants were indicated for revision of primary STAR implant (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) and underwent replacement with 3D-printed titanium implants based on preoperative CT analysis (Additive Orthopaedics, Little Silver, NJ). Custom components included a mobile-bearing total talus and stemmed tibial system, performed through an anterior approach. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Pre- and postoperative implant alignment was assessed using medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) and tibiotalar angle (TTA) on anteroposterior, and sagittal tibial angle (STA) on lateral weight-bearing plain films.

Results: The average patient age was 60.6 (range, 39-77) years, with an average follow-up of 37.9 (range, 25.3-57.5) months. There was statistically significant improvement in all PROMIS domains. Short-term survivorship was 100%, with two participants (11.0%) requiring reoperation for postoperative complications: one underwent open reduction internal fixation of the tibia for a periprosthetic fracture, and another underwent medial gutter debridement and tarsal tunnel release for recurrent pain. There were no significant differences in pre- versus postoperative radiographic alignment measured by MDTA (89.9 vs 86.4), TTA (89.7 vs 88.1), or STA (85.2 vs 85.3).

Conclusion: Custom 3D-printed TATR is a promising option for revision TAR. There was significant short-term improvement in pain and physical function, with excellent short-term survivorship and an acceptable postoperative complication rate.

Keywords: 3D printing; Ankle replacement; Failure; Total ankle arthroplasty.