Accessibility of intimate partner violence-related services for young women in Spain. Qualitative study on professionals' perspectives

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0297886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297886. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common among young people, but the use of IPV resources among young adult women and teenagers is limited. This study aims to analyze professionals' perceptions about the main barriers and facilitators encountered by young women (16-29 years old) exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) when accessing formal services in Spain.

Methods: Qualitative study based on 17 in depth interviews carried out in 2019 with professionals who manage resources for IPV care in Madrid (Spain) from different sectors (social services, health care, security forces, women or youth issues offices, associations). A qualitative content analysis was conducted.

Results: The professionals interviewed perceive the following barriers: 1) Time it takes for young women to recognize IPV because the social construction of sexual-affective relationships is permeated by gender inequality; 2) The process of leaving a situation of abuse; 3) Barriers inherent to IPV services. The key aspects to improve access to these resources are related to care services, professional practice, and the young women themselves.

Conclusions: There are both psychosocial barriers, derived from the process of leaving a situation of violence, as well as structural barriers for young women to access and properly use the recognized services specifically aimed at them or comprehensive IPV care. Services need to be tailored to the needs of young women so they can be truly effective in order to escape IPV.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intimate Partner Violence* / psychology
  • Qualitative Research
  • Spain
  • Violence
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study has been funded by the Health Institute Carlos III. Project reference: PI17CIII/00022. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.