Background: The TactiFlex SE catheter (TFSE, Abbott) with a contact force (CF) sensor and a laser-cut irrigated-tip has recently become available but lacks a lesion quality marker. This study aimed to explore distinctions in lesion characteristics between the TFSE and the ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow catheter (STSF, Biosense Webster), which utilizes a porous irrigated tip, and to assess the most effective application settings for the TFSE.
Methods: Lesions were generated using varying settings of radiofrequency power (30-50 W), CF (10-20 g), application duration (10-40 s), and catheter orientation (perpendicular or parallel) in an ex vivo porcine model. Comparative analysis between the TFSE and STSF was conducted for lesion characteristics and incidence of steam pops using predictive models in regression analyses.
Results: Among 720 applications, the TFSE exhibited a significantly lower incidence of steam pops compared to the STSF (0.6% vs. 36.8%, P < 0.001). Moreover, coefficients of determination (R2) for the TFSE were higher than those for the STSF concerning lesion depth (0.710 vs. 0.541) and volume (0.723 vs. 0.618). The lesion size generated with the TFSE was notably smaller than that with the STSF under identical application settings. Additionally, to achieve a lesion depth ≥ 4.0 mm, the TFSE required an application duration 8-12 s longer than the STSF under similar settings.
Conclusions: The TFSE demonstrated a lower incidence of steam pops and superior predictability in lesion size compared to the STSF. However, the TFSE necessitated a longer application duration than the STSF to achieve an adequate lesion size.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Lesion formation; Radiofrequency ablation; SmartTouch SurroundFlow; TactiFlex SE.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.