Do institutions contribute to environmental sustainability? A global analysis using the dynamic spatial Durbin and threshold models

J Environ Manage. 2024 Apr:357:120681. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120681. Epub 2024 Mar 30.

Abstract

There has been a recent surge in attention to the potential involvement of institutions in enhancing environmental quality. This research contributes to the ongoing debate by analyzing the spillover and nonlinear effects of institutions on the load capacity factor (LCF) in a sample of 100 countries between 2000 and 2019. The spillover effects are analyzed using the dynamic spatial Durbin model (DSDM), while the dynamic threshold model is implemented to estimate the nonlinear impacts of institutions. The Moran's I and Geary's C tests reveal a positive spatial autocorrelation for the LCF. The DSDM indicates the existence of positive direct and indirect (spillover) effects of political stability, control of corruption, and the rule of law on the LCF. Moreover, control of corruption has the highest positive influence on the environment. When conducting the threshold analysis, the locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curve indicates a nonlinear relationship between institutions and LCF, while the threshold test suggests a single threshold and two regimes. The dynamic panel threshold model reveals that government effectiveness and the rule of law positively affect the environment under both regimes. On the contrary, the positive effects of control of corruption, regulatory quality, and political stability are only observed under the upper regime. Furthermore, control of corruption has the highest positive environmental impact, albeit it needs more time to be achieved. The research emphasizes the importance of international collaboration and the design of both short- and long-term strategies to enhance institutional quality and, consequently, safeguard the environment.

Keywords: Dynamic spatial Durbin model; Dynamic threshold model; Institutions; Load capacity factor.

MeSH terms

  • China
  • Economic Development*
  • Government*
  • Spatial Analysis