Flourishing or Frightening? Feelings about Natural and Built Green Spaces in Singapore

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 14;21(3):347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030347.

Abstract

The current study's aim was to better understand people's feelings towards different types of natural and built green space environments in the highly urbanized "garden city" of Singapore. We examined which types of green spaces elicited positive (eudemonic) or negative (apprehensive) affective responses. A total of 288 adult residents of Singapore completed a survey that asked them to report their affective states in response to images of 10 locally different environment types and to complete measures of childhood location, frequency of visiting natural/built environments, nature connectedness, and dispositional anxiety, as well as demographic items on age and gender. The 10 green space environment types were mapped onto an experiential state space representing feelings of apprehension and eudemonia in response to specific types of urban green spaces. In terms of a biophilic response, feelings of eudemonia were no different in natural green spaces compared to built green spaces. A higher frequency of experience in specific environments is associated with enhanced feelings of eudemonia in these environments. The findings indicate that people in Singapore can be apprehensive as much in natural green spaces as in built green spaces, and they can also find eudemonic experiences in built green spaces such as roof-top gardens or town parks.

Keywords: eudemonia and apprehension; experiential feeling states; frequency of experience; nature connectedness; trait anxiety; types of green spaces (natural or built).

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cities
  • Emotions*
  • Fear
  • Humans
  • Parks, Recreational*
  • Singapore

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.