In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic made social distancing compulsory. In patient lectures by hepatitis B patients (Patient Lectures)-a humanity education initiative that had traditionally been delivered face-to-face to assembled students-it was necessary to divide the students into two groups, one that attended the Patient Lectures in person (face-to-face group) and another that assembled in a separate room to view the delivered lecture simultaneously and remotely via a teleconferencing platform (remote group). To investigate possible changes in students' awareness of hepatitis B patients before (pre-) and after (post-) the lecture that year, the face-to-face and remote-attendance groups were analyzed separately. The participants were 203 fourth-year students belonging to the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Japan's Setsunan University, whose pre-clinical education curriculum prior to pharmacy practice experience included a Patient Lecture. The students were divided into two groups based on their student-ID numbers. Survey questionnaires were completed anonymously before and after the Patient Lecture. The students' awareness of hepatitis B patients' experience changed significantly after attending the Patient Lectures; this change was similar in both the face-to-face and remote-attendance groups. Regarding the possibility of hepatitis B virus infection, the remote group selected fewer answers implying strong convictions than did the face-to-face group, and both groups perceived several issues incorrectly. Although slight differences were observed between the two groups, the changes before and after the lectures were similar, indicating that humanity-education lectures are worthwhile not only when delivered in face-to-face contexts but also when delivered and viewed remotely within a class setting.
Keywords: face-to-face lecture; hepatitis B; humanity education; patient lecture; pre-clinical education; remote lecture.