Tourniquets have long been used in total knee arthroplasty due to the theoretical improvement of bleeding control, integration of cement-bone interface, visibility, and efficiency of the overall surgery. However, this has become increasingly disputed. Comparative studies in total knee arthroplasty employing chemical prophylaxis, i.e., tranexamic acid, have been conducted. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the effect of tranexamic with or without a tourniquet on mean blood loss, hemoglobin, and length of stay in total knee arthroplasty patients. A total of 153 patients' records met the inclusion criteria, 95 patients (62%) were in the tranexamic acid-only group while 58 patients (38%) were in the tranexamic acid plus tourniquet group. Based on mean blood loss in mL (827.5 without vs. 810.1 with the tourniquet, p=0.805), hemoglobin counts in g/dL (12.6 without vs. 12.5 with the tourniquet, p=0.598), and length of stay in days (1.0 days without vs. 1.1 with the tourniquet, p=0.204), there was no statistical difference between the tranexamic alone vs. tranexamic plus tourniquet groups. There were no statistical differences in the mean BMI between groups (32.3 without vs. 32.4 with tourniquets, p=0.901). The patient population had more women (64.1%) than men (35.9%) (p=0.001), but no significant difference in gender based on tourniquet use (p=0.521). The tourniquet group averaged three years younger than the tranexamic alone group (age mean 68.2 without vs 65.3 with tranexamic, p=0.029). This study found no identifiable difference in the three observed variables, indicating that tourniquet provides limited to no additional benefit in reducing blood loss over tranexamic alone in total knee arthroplasty, while tranexamic alone has no deleterious decrease in mean hemoglobin or increase in length of stay.
Keywords: blood loss; hemoglobin; joint replacement; orthopedic surgery; total knee arthroplasty; tourniquet; tranexamic acid.
Copyright © 2024, Ketelaar et al.