Aims: Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) is a known outcome predictor in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for functional mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to assess its prognostic yield in the setting of TEER for chronic primary MR.
Methods and results: We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of 323 consecutive patients undergoing isolated, first-time procedures. Stratified by baseline LVGLS quartiles (≤-19%, -18.9-(-16)%, -15.9-(-12)%, > -12%), the cohort was evaluated for the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalizations, as well as secondary endpoints consisting of mitral reinterventions and the persistence of significant residual MR and/or functional disability - all along the first year after intervention. Subjects with worse (i.e., less negative) LVGLS exhibited higher comorbidity, more advanced HF, and elevated procedural risk. Post-TEER, those belonging to the worst LVGLS quartile group sustained increased mortality (16.9 vs 6.3%, Log-Rank p = 0.005, HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.08-4.74, p = 0.041) and, when affected by LV dysfunction/dilatation, more primary outcome events (21.1 vs 11.5%, Log-Rank p = 0.037, HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.02-5.46, p = 0.047). No association was demonstrated with other endpoints. Upon exploratory analysis, 1-month postprocedural LVGLS directly correlated with and was worse than its baseline counterpart by 1.6%, and a more impaired 1-month value - but not the presence/extent of deterioration - conferred heightened risk for the primary outcome.
Conclusion: TEER for chronic primary MR is feasible, safe, and efficacious irrespective of baseline LVGLS. Yet, worse baseline LVGLS forecasts a less favorable postprocedural course, presumably reflecting a higher-risk patient profile.
Keywords: Global longitudinal strain; MitraClip; Mitral regurgitation; Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair; Transcatheter mitral valve repair.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.