Irritant and repellent behaviors of sterile male Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes are crucial in the development of disease control strategies applying sterile insect technique

PeerJ. 2024 Mar 22:12:e17038. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17038. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The mosquito Aedes aegypti, known to transmit important arboviral diseases, including dengue, chikungunya, Zika and yellow fever. Given the importance of this disease vector, a number of control programs have been proposed involving the use of the sterile insect technique (SIT). However, the success of this technique hinges on having a good understanding of the biology and behavior of the male mosquito. Behavioral responses of Ae. aegypti male populations developed for SIT technology were tested under laboratory conditions against chemical and natural irritants and repellents using an excito-repellency (ER) chamber. The results showed that there were no significant behavioral escape responses in any of the radiation-sterilized male Ae. aegypti test populations when exposed to citronella, DEET, transfluthrin, and deltamethrin, suggesting that SIT did not suppress the expected irritancy and repellency (avoidance) behaviors. The type of information reported in the current study is vital in defining the effects of SIT on vector behavior and understanding how such behavior may influence the success of SIT technology with regard to other vector control interventions.

Keywords: Aedes aegypti; Irritancy; Male behavior; Repellency; Sterile insect technique (SIT).

MeSH terms

  • Aedes*
  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Infertility, Male* / prevention & control
  • Insect Repellents* / pharmacology
  • Irritants / pharmacology
  • Male
  • Mosquito Vectors / physiology
  • Zika Virus Infection*
  • Zika Virus*

Substances

  • Irritants
  • Insect Repellents

Grants and funding

The Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (Public Organization) and the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Bangkok, Thailand (Grant No. YF (KU) 33.65) provided financial support. This work was also supported by the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (Grant# FF (KU) 14.64). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.