The broader adoption of urine-diverting technologies (UDTs) and related products has been proposed as a strategy for moving towards a more circular economy. While some studies have explored the performance of UDTs, the interconnected factors involving supply, demand, and economic feasibility of UDTs remain under-researched. Our systematic review addresses this gap. Our search identified only 64 relevant, peer-reviewed studies, 71 % of which addressed the supply side (primarily the technical aspect of UDTs) and 58 % of which addressed the demand side (focusing on consumers' perceptions). Approximately one-third (18) of these studies delved into the economic feasibility of UDTs, with only 9 employing a cost benefit analysis (CBA) framework. However, none of these studies have analysed the economic performance of UDTs that have been fully deployed, indicating a significant knowledge gap. Our review suggests that overcoming challenges in scaling up UDTs can be achieved by engaging those stakeholders driving the uptake, developing business cases that offer an overall understanding of both market and non-market benefits of UDTs, addressing technological constraints by optimising urine treatment options for efficiency and economic viability, and enhancing stakeholders' acceptance of UDTs.
Keywords: Business case; Circular economy; Cost benefit analysis; Economic feasibility; Source separation; Urine-sourced fertiliser.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.