Does source matter? Examining the effects of health experts, friends, and social media influencers on young adult perceptions of Instagram e-cigarette education messages

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 May 1:258:111270. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111270. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

Abstract

Purpose: Young adults' e-cigarette use is a leading public health concern. Using messages from credible sources can help improve message acceptance, yet little research has examined the role of source credibility on young adults' responses to e-cigarette education messages.

Methods: We examined the impact of source on young adults' perceptions of e-cigarette education messages and e-cigarettes. In July 2022, we conducted an experimental study using an online sample of young adults (N=459, Mage=24.6) who were randomized to one of three source conditions: expert, friend, or influencer, and viewed e-cigarette education messages. We used one-way ANOVA to estimate the association between the conditions and outcomes (perceived source credibility, message trust, curiosity, use interests, perceived message effectiveness, beliefs, harm perceptions, and intentions to refrain).

Results: The expert condition was associated with significantly higher perceived source credibility (vs. friend, influencer; p<0.001), message trust (vs. friend, influencer; p<0.001), and curiosity (vs. influencer; p's<0.05).

Conclusions: Public health campaigns may leverage health experts to deliver e-cigarette education messages targeting young adults to improve effectiveness of the messages.

Keywords: E-cigarette education messages; Instagram anti-vaping messages; Source credibility; Young adults.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems*
  • Female
  • Friends*
  • Health Education / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Social Media*
  • Trust
  • Vaping / psychology
  • Young Adult