Expression of Caudal-Type Homologous Transcription Factor-2 (CDX2) in Duodenal Carcinoma and its Relationship with Prognosis

Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 Mar 22:AT10633. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Objective: Caudal-type homologous transcription factor 2 (CDX2) has been shown to be associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer, with those with high expression having a good prognosis and those with low expression having a poor prognosis. As duodenal and colorectal cancers are similar in histological origin, we suspect that CDX2 expression in duodenal cancer may also be related to prognosis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the expression of CDX2 in duodenal cancer and its relationship with prognosis.

Methods: We collected the clinical data and pathological sections of 61 patients diagnosed with duodenal cancer by histopathology or cytology at Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, from November 2011 to December 2022. CDX2 expressionin in duodenal cancer was detected by immunohistochemical analysis (streptavidin-peroxidasemethod, SP). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression analysis.

Results: The positive rate of CDX2 in duodenal carcinoma was 78.7% (48/61). The positive rate of CDX2 expression in patients with stage I/II was higher than that in patients with stage III/IV (P < .05), and there was no correlation between CDX2 expression and gender, age, degree of differentiation, CEA and anemia (P > .05). Univariate analysis by Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank test showed that the expression of CDX2, degree of differentiation, TNM staging and CEA were associated with the prognosis of CDX2 in the negative and positive for the OS 21.6 months and 49.8 months, respectively (P = .015). The median OS of poorly differentiated patients and moderately/well-differentiated patients were 13 months and 82.5 months, respectively (P < .001). The median OS for Stage I/II and Stage III/IV patients was 72.3 and 13 months, respectively (P < .001). The median OS of CEA < 5 ug/L and ≥5 ug/L were 49.8 months and 9.4 months, respectively (P = .002). Age, gender and whether anemia were not associated with prognosis (P > .05). Multivariate analysis by Cox regression analysis showed that the expression of CDX2 (RR=2.697, 95%CI: 1.191-6.106, P = .017) was an independent prognostic factor of duodenal carcinoma. The results suggest that the expression of CDX2 in duodenal cancer is closely related to the prognosis. Those with positive expression have a better prognosis and those with negative expression have a worse prognosis.

Conclusion: CDX2 serves as an autonomous prognostic determinant in individuals diagnosed with duodenal cancer. Notably, patients exhibiting positive CDX2 expression demonstrate a considerably improved prognosis compared to those with negative CDX2 expression. CDX2 may play an important role as an tumor suppressor gene in the development of duodenal cancer. CDX2 can be used as an important factor for evaluating the prognosis of patients with duodenal cancer, and it has the potential to be a target for duodenal cancer therapy.