Background: Post-auricular injection of lidocaine and methylprednisolone sodium succinate is a commonly used treatment for outpatient patients with tinnitus, but it is invasive, painful and has uncertain efficacy. We need to try to replace it with more non-invasive and effective treatments. The 2014 guidelines of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommend the use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to treat tinnitus. Some clinical doctors have also attempted sound therapy for tinnitus. It is unclear whether sound therapy combined with CBT y is more effective than local injection of lidocaine and methylprednisolone sodium succinate in treating tinnitus.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and influencing factors of refined sound therapy combined with CBT in the treatment of tinnitus and compare it with post-auricular injection of lidocaine and methylprednisolone sodium succinate.
Methods: We recruited 100 patients with tinnitus; ultimately, 81 patients completed the experiment and underwent follow-up. Patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment group (refined sound therapy combined with CBT) or the control group (post-auricular injections of lidocaine and methylprednisolone sodium succinate). Data was collected from 49 patients in the treatment group and 32 patients in the control group. Pre- and post-treatment data were collected using the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), Tinnitus loudness and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score. Comparisons between groups were performed using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All tests were two-sided and considered statistically significant with P < .05.
Results: The THI, SDS and HAM-A scores in the treatment group decreased significantly. In the control group, there was a significant reduction in THI scores, but not in SDS and HAM-A scores. In addition, tinnitus loudness and VAS scores were significantly decreased in the 2 groups. There was a significant difference in the reduction of THI, SDS, HAM-A and VAS scores between the 2 groups; the treatment group showed a greater reduction. However, there was no significant difference in the reduction of tinnitus loudness. There was no statistical difference in the reduction of THI scores, SDS scores, VAS scores and tinnitus loudness in different frequency groups, but there was a statistical difference in the reduction of HAM-A scores. There was no statistical difference in the reduction of THI scores, SDS scores, HAM-A scores, VAS scores and tinnitus loudness between patients with and without hearing loss.
Conclusions: (1) This new combination is more effective than post-auricular injection of lidocaine and methylprednisolone sodium succinate in treating tinnitus and improving psychological symptoms. The latter had no effect on improving psychological indicators. (2) With this combination, patients with different tinnitus frequencies experienced different improvements in anxiety. (3) Low-frequency tinnitus seems have been more likely to cause sound adaptation. (4) The improvement in tinnitus and anxiety was the same regardless of whether or not there was hearing loss.