"And this is the life jacket, the lifeline they've been wanting": Participant perspectives on navigating challenges and successes of prescribed safer supply

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 22;19(3):e0299801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299801. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: In 2021, 43% of drug toxicity deaths in Ontario were reported by public health units serving medium-sized urban and rural communities. Safer supply programs (SSPs) have been primarily established in large urban centres. Given this, the current study is based on an evaluation of a SSP based in a medium-sized urban centre with a large catchment area that includes rural and Indigenous communities. The aim of this research paper is to understand the challenges and successes of the nurse practitioner-led SSP from the perspective of program participants.

Methods: Interpretive description was used to understand the experiences of 14 participants accessing a SSP. Each participant was interviewed using a semi-structured approach, and 13 of the interviewees also completed surveys accessed through Qualtrics. An iterative process using NVivo software was used to code interviews, and a constant comparative data analysis approach was used to refine and categorize codes to themes.

Findings: Three overarching themes were the result of this analysis: feeling better, renewed hope, and safety. These three themes capture the experiences of participants in the SSP, including both the challenges and successes they faced.

Conclusion: The findings and subsequent discussion focus on both the key best practices of the program, and areas for future development and improvement. Despite barriers to services, prescribed SSPs are improving the lives of people who use drugs, and the current outcomes align with reports and evaluations from other SSPs across Canada.

MeSH terms

  • Catchment Area, Health*
  • Humans
  • Ontario

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Health Canada's Substance Use and Addictions Program (SUAP) under Grant 2122-HQ-000001; and Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) under Grant EV1-174804. The funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.