Grain versus AIN: Common rodent diets differentially affect health outcomes in adult C57BL/6j mice

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0293487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293487. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Semi-synthetic and grain-based diets are common rodent diets for biomedical research. Both diet types are considered nutritionally adequate to support breeding, growth, and long life, yet there are fundamental differences between them that may affect metabolic processes. We have characterized the effects of diet type on breeding outcomes, metabolic phenotype, and microbiota profile in adult mice. Healthy 8-week-old female and male C57BL/6J mice were fed a semi-synthetic or a grain-based diet for 12 weeks and changes in body weight and body composition were monitored. Breeding outcomes were determined. Body fat accumulation of female mice was lower on the semi-synthetic diet than on the grain-based diet. Pregnancy rate and newborn pup survival appeared to be lower in mice exposed to semi-synthetic diet compared to grain-based diet. Both female and male mice showed a profound change in fecal microbiota alpha and beta diversity depending on diet type. Our study shows that type of rodent diet may affect breeding outcomes whilst influencing metabolism and health of female laboratory mice. These factors have the potential to influence other experimental outcomes and the results suggest that semi-synthetic and grain-based diets are not interchangeable in research using rodent models. Careful consideration and increased understanding of the consequences of diet choice would lead to improvements in experimental design and reproducibility of study results.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Diet
  • Female
  • Male
  • Mice
  • Mice, Inbred C57BL
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Plant Breeding*
  • Pregnancy
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Rodentia*

Grants and funding

This study was funded by Danone Nutricia Research. The funder provided support to the current study by covering research costs and in the form of salaries for all authors. All authors were employed by the funder at the time this study was conducted. The funder therefore had a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript.