Purpose: The standard follow-up for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is based on cystoscopy. Unfortunately, post-instillation inflammatory changes can make the interpretation of this exam difficult, with lower specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the interest of bladder MRI in the follow-up of patients following intravesical instillation.
Methods: Data from patients who underwent cystoscopy and bladder MRI in a post-intravesical instillation setting between February 2020 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. Primary endpoint was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of cystoscopy and bladder MRI in the overall cohort (n = 67) using the pathologic results of TURB as a reference. The secondary endpoint was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of cystoscopy and bladder MRI according to the appearance of the lesion on cystoscopy [flat (n = 40) or papillary (n = 27)].
Results: The diagnostic performance of bladder MRI was better than that of cystoscopy, with a specificity of 47% (vs. 6%, p < 0.001), a negative predictive value of 88% (vs. 40%, p = 0.03), and a positive predictive value of 66% (vs. 51%, p < 0.001), whereas the sensitivity did not significantly differ between the two exams. In patients with doubtful cystoscopy and negative MRI findings, inflammatory changes were found on TURB in most cases (17/19). The superiority in MRI bladder performance prevailed for "flat lesions", while no significant difference was found for "papillary lesions".
Conclusions: In cases of doubtful cystoscopy after intravesical instillations, MRI appears to be relevant with good performance in differentiating post-therapeutic inflammatory changes from recurrent tumor lesions and could potentially allow avoiding unnecessary TURB.
Keywords: Bladder cancer; Intravesical instillation; Magnetic Imaging Resonance; Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; Urothelial carcinoma.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.