Understanding the enablers to implementing sustainable health and well-being programs for older adults in rural Australia: A scoping review

Belinda Cash; Michael Lawless; Kristy Robson; Shanna Fealy; Denise Corboy

doi:10.1111/ajr.13111

Understanding the enablers to implementing sustainable health and well-being programs for older adults in rural Australia: A scoping review

Aust J Rural Health. 2024 Mar 20. doi: 10.1111/ajr.13111. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Belinda Cash¹, Michael Lawless², Kristy Robson³, Shanna Fealy⁴, Denise Corboy⁵

Affiliations

¹ Manna Institute, Ageing Well in Rural and Regional Australia Research Group, School of Social Work and Arts, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
² College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
³ Three Rivers Department of Rural Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
⁴ Ageing Well in Rural and Regional Australia Research Group, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
⁵ Blue Sky Mind Research Consultancy, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.

PMID: 38506524
DOI: 10.1111/ajr.13111

Abstract

Introduction: Supporting the health and well-being of older Australians necessitates the implementation of effective and sustainable community-based interventions. Rural settings, however, pose unique challenges to intervention implementation and sustainability, with limited research exploring strategies employed to overcome these complexities.

Objective: To identify enabling strategies that support the sustainable implementation of community-based health and well-being interventions for older adults in rural Australia.

Design: A scoping review, following methods by Arksey and O'Malley and enhanced by elements of the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), was conducted. An electronic search of seven databases was completed in April 2023. A thematic analysis was applied to provide a comprehensive and contextualised understanding of the phenomenon of interest.

Findings: Of 1277 records screened, 15 studies were identified and included for review. Five themes identified key enablers for rural implementation: (1) Co-designing for the local context; (2) Embedding local champions; (3) Leveraging existing local resources; (4) Maintaining impact beyond the end of the funded period and (5) Flexibility in funding models.

Discussion: The sustainable implementation of interventions requires active community involvement and consultation through all stages of program design and delivery to effectively meet the health and well-being needs of older rural-dwelling Australians.

Conclusion: Our findings advocate for clear implementation guidelines to support the design, delivery and adaptation of community-based programs that appropriately reflect the unique contextual needs and strengths of rural communities.

Keywords: ageing; implementation; intervention; program design; rural.

Publication types

Review

Grants and funding

Charles Sturt University