Systematic review and meta-analysis: assessing the accuracy of rapid immunochromatographic tests in dengue diagnosis

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jun;109(2):116227. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116227. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of rapid dengue diagnostic tests. The search was conducted in the following databases: LILACS, Medline (Pubmed), CRD, The Cochrane Library, Trip Medical Database and Google Scholar. ELISA and PCR assays were adopted as reference methods. Thirty-four articles were included in this systematic review. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Forest Plot were performed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity for each parameter analyzed (NS1, IgM and IgG). The results revealed that the combined analysis of the IgM antibody with the NS1 antigen resulted in greater sensitivity than the isolated analysis of IgM. The three analytes together showed the best performance, with a combined sensitivity of 90 % (95 % CI: 89-92 %) using ELISA as a comparator. Thus, the present review provides relevant knowledge for decision-making between the available rapid diagnostic tests.

Keywords: Accuracy; Dengue; ELISA; PCR; Rapid immunochromatographic tests.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral* / blood
  • Chromatography, Affinity / methods
  • Dengue Virus / immunology
  • Dengue* / diagnosis
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / methods
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / standards
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G / blood
  • Immunoglobulin M* / blood
  • ROC Curve
  • Sensitivity and Specificity*
  • Viral Nonstructural Proteins / blood
  • Viral Nonstructural Proteins / immunology

Substances

  • Immunoglobulin M
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Viral Nonstructural Proteins