Evaluation of different Kabuli chickpea genotypes against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in relation to biotic and abiotic factors

PeerJ. 2024 Mar 13:12:e16944. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16944. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: The chickpea pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) is a significant insect pest of chickpea crops, causing substantial global losses.

Methods: Field experiments were conducted in Central Punjab, Pakistan, to investigate the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on pod borer population dynamics and infestation in nine kabuli chickpea genotypes during two cropping seasons (2020-2021 and 2021-2022). The crops were sown in November in both years, with row-to-row and plant-to-plant distances of 30 and 15 cm, respectively, following a randomized complete block design (RCBD).

Results: Results showed a significant difference among the tested genotypes in trichome density, pod wall thickness, and leaf chlorophyll contents. Significantly lower larval population (0.85 and 1.10 larvae per plant) and percent damage (10.65% and 14.25%) were observed in genotype Noor-2019 during 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, respectively. Pod trichome density, pod wall thickness, and chlorophyll content of leaves also showed significant variation among the tested genotypes. Pod trichome density and pod wall thickness correlated negatively with larval infestation, while chlorophyll content in leaves showed a positive correlation. Additionally, the larval population positively correlated with minimum and maximum temperatures, while relative humidity negatively correlated with the larval population. Study results explore natural enemies as potential biological control agents and reduce reliance on chemical pesticides.

Keywords: Abiotic factors; Chickpea; Chlorophyll contents; Genetic resilience; Genotypes; Physio-morphic characters; Trichomes.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Chlorophyll
  • Cicer* / genetics
  • Crops, Agricultural / genetics
  • Genotype
  • Helicoverpa armigera
  • Larva / genetics
  • Moths* / genetics

Substances

  • Chlorophyll

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a grant for high-level talents of Guanxi Science and Technology Normal University (GKS 20220901). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.