Objectives: Compare the feeding management practices in infants with cleft palate with and without Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) and determine if specific feeding difficulties or interventions predict delayed palate repair.
Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Setting: Seventeen cleft palate teams contributed data.
Patients: 414 infants were included in this study: 268 infants with cleft palate only and 146 infants with cleft palate and PRS.
Procedures: Data were collected via parent interview and electronic health records.
Main outcome measures: Outcomes for the primary objective included categorical data for: history of poor growth, feeding therapy, milk fortification, use of enteral feeding, and feeding difficulties. The outcome for the secondary objective was age in months at primary palate repair.
Results: Infants with PRS had a significantly higher prevalence of feeding difficulties (81% versus 61%) and poor growth (29% versus 15%) compared to infants with cleft palate only. Infants with PRS received all feeding interventions-including feeding therapy, milk fortification, and enteral feeding-at a significantly higher frequency. Infants with PRS underwent primary palate repair at a mean age of 13.55 months (SD = 3.29) which was significantly (P < .00001) later than infants with cleft palate only who underwent palate repair at a mean age of 12.05 months (SD = 2.36). Predictors of delayed palate repair included diagnosis of PRS as well as Hispanic ethnicity and a history of poor growth.
Conclusions: These findings can be used to establish clinical directives focused on providing early, multimodal feeding interventions to promote optimal growth and timely palate repair for infants with PRS.
Keywords: Pierre Robin sequence; cleft palate; feeding.