Linagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor used for the management of type-2 diabetes. US FDA-approved products are available exclusively as oral tablets. The inherent drawbacks of the oral administration route necessitate exploring delivery strategies via other routes. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of transdermal administration of linagliptin through various approaches. We compared chemical penetration enhancers (oleic acid, oleyl alcohol, and isopropyl myristate) and physical enhancement techniques (iontophoresis, sonophoresis, microneedles, laser, and microdermabrasion) to understand their potential to improve transdermal delivery of linagliptin. To our knowledge, this is the first reported comparison of chemical and physical enhancement techniques for the transdermal delivery of a moderately lipophilic molecule. All physical enhancement techniques caused a significant reduction in the transepithelial electrical resistance of the skin samples. Disruption of the skin's structure post-treatment with physical enhancement techniques was further confirmed using characterization techniques such as dye binding, histology, and confocal microscopy. In vitro permeation testing (IVPT) demonstrated that the passive delivery of linagliptin across the skin was < 5 µg/sq.cm. Two penetration enhancers - oleic acid (93.39 ± 8.34 µg/sq.cm.) and oleyl alcohol (424.73 ± 42.86 µg/sq.cm.), and three physical techniques - iontophoresis (53.05 ± 0.79 µg/sq.cm.), sonophoresis (141.13 ± 34.22 µg/sq.cm.), and laser (555.11 ± 78.97 µg/sq.cm.) exceeded the desired target delivery for therapeutic effect. This study established that linagliptin is an excellent candidate for transdermal delivery and thoroughly compared chemical penetration and physical transdermal delivery strategies.
Keywords: Diabetes; In vitro permeation testing; Iontophoresis; Laser; Microneedles; Skin; Transdermal.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.