Derivation and validation of a quantitative risk prediction model for weaning and extubation in neurocritical patients

Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 27:15:1337225. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1337225. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe neurological conditions are at high risk during withdrawal and extubation, so it is important to establish a model that can quantitatively predict the risk of this procedure.

Methods: By analyzing the data of patients with traumatic brain injury and tracheal intubation in the ICU of the affiliated hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, a total of 200 patients were included, of which 140 were in the modeling group and 60 were in the validation group. Through binary logistic regression analysis, 8 independent risk factors closely related to the success of extubation were screened out, including age ≥ 65 years old, APACHE II score ≥ 15 points, combined chronic pulmonary disease, GCS score < 8 points, oxygenation index <300, cough reflex, sputum suction frequency, and swallowing function.

Results: Based on these factors, a risk prediction scoring model for extubation was constructed with a critical value of 18 points. The AUC of the model was 0.832, the overall prediction accuracy was 81.5%, the specificity was 81.6%, and the sensitivity was 84.1%. The data of the validation group showed that the AUC of the model was 0.763, the overall prediction accuracy was 79.8%, the specificity was 84.8%, and the sensitivity was 64.0%.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the extubation risk prediction model constructed through quantitative scoring has good predictive accuracy and can provide a scientific basis for clinical practice, helping to assess and predict extubation risk, thereby improving the success rate of extubation and improving patient prognosis.

Keywords: neurocritical care; risk factors; risk prediction model; traumatic brain injury; weaning assessment.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from Malaysian Government Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS 2019; 203 CIPPT 6711727), Universiti Sains Malaysia Short Term Grant (ST; 304 CIPPT 6315469) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, 81960877; University Innovation Fund of Gansu Province (No. 2021A-076), Gansu Province Science and Technology Plan Innovation Base and Talent Plan (No. 21JR7RA561), Special open project of Gansu Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. zyzx-2020-zx10), Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (No. 21JR1RA267), Education Technology Innovation Project of Gansu Province(No. 2022A-067), Innovation Fund of Higher Education of Gansu Province (No. 2023A-088) and Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (No. 22JR5RA582), Gansu Province science and technology plan international cooperation field project (No. 23YFWA0005), Medical and Health Science Foundation of Zhejiang (2023KY186) and the Hangzhou Medical Key Discipline Construction Program ([2021] No. 21). These funds played a role in the conceptualization and design of the studies reported in this review. They provided input in the initial stages of research planning.