Flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center study with a standardized antithrombotic treatment protocol

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Mar 11;166(1):130. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06029-7.

Abstract

Background: The use of antithrombotic medication following acute flow diversion for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm (IA) is challenging with no current guidelines. We investigated the incidence of treatment-related complications and patient outcomes after flow diversion for a ruptured IA before and after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic medication protocol.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including consecutive patients treated for acutely ruptured IAs with flow diversion during 2015-2023. We divided the patients into two groups: those treated before the implementation of the protocol (pre-protocol) and those treated after the implementation of the protocol (post-protocol). The primary outcomes were hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. A secondary outcome was clinical outcome using the modified Ranking Scale (mRS).

Results: Totally 39 patients with 40 ruptured IAs were treated with flow diversion (69% pre-protocol, 31% post-protocol). The patient mean age was 55 years, 62% were female, 63% of aneurysms were in the posterior circulation, 92% of aneurysms were non-saccular, and 44% were in poor grade on admission. Treatment differences included the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (pre-group 48% vs. post-group 100%), and the use of early dual antiplatelets (pre-group 44% vs. 92% post-group). The incidence of ischemic complications was 37% and 42% and the incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 30% and 33% in the pre- and post-groups, respectively, with no between-group differences. There were three (11%) aneurysm re-ruptures in the pre-group and none in the post-group. There were no differences in mortality or mRS 0-2 between the groups at 6 months.

Conclusion: We found no major differences in the incidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic complications after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic protocol for acute flow diversion for ruptured IAs. There is an urgent need for more evidence-based guidelines to optimize antithrombotic treatment after flow diversion in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Keywords: Antithrombotic medication; Dual antiplatelet therapy; Flow diversion; Flow diverter; Intensive care; Intracranial aneurysm; Subarachnoid hemorrhage.

MeSH terms

  • Aneurysm, Ruptured* / drug therapy
  • Aneurysm, Ruptured* / etiology
  • Aneurysm, Ruptured* / surgery
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Embolization, Therapeutic* / methods
  • Endovascular Procedures* / methods
  • Female
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Intracranial Aneurysm* / drug therapy
  • Intracranial Aneurysm* / etiology
  • Intracranial Aneurysm* / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Fibrinolytic Agents