An implementation strategy postmortem method developed in the VA rural Transitions Nurse Program to inform spread and scale-up

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0298552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298552. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: High-quality implementation evaluations report on intervention fidelity and adaptations made, but a practical process for evaluating implementation strategies is needed. A retrospective method for evaluating implementation strategies is also required as prospective methods can be resource intensive. This study aimed to establish an implementation strategy postmortem method to identify the implementation strategies used, when, and their perceived importance. We used the rural Transitions Nurse Program (TNP) as a case study, a national care coordination intervention implemented at 11 hospitals over three years.

Methods: The postmortem used a retrospective, mixed method, phased approach. Implementation team and front-line staff characterized the implementation strategies used, their timing, frequency, ease of use, and their importance to implementation success. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation, the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative phases, and Proctor and colleagues' guidance were used to operationalize the strategies. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed using matrix content analysis.

Results: The postmortem method identified 45 of 73 ERIC strategies introduced, including 41 during pre-implementation, 37 during implementation, and 27 during sustainment. External facilitation, centralized technical assistance, and clinical supervision were ranked as the most important and frequently used strategies. Implementation strategies were more intensively applied in the beginning of the study and tapered over time.

Conclusions: The postmortem method identified that more strategies were used in TNP than planned and identified the most important strategies from the perspective of the implementation team and front-line staff. The findings can inform other implementation studies as well as dissemination of the TNP intervention.

MeSH terms

  • Counseling*
  • Health Plan Implementation / methods
  • Humans
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rural Population*

Grants and funding

This material is based upon work supported (or supported in part) by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VA), VA Office of Rural Health, and Office of Nursing Services. The Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development Service provides support through the Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care. Dr. Gilmartin is supported by Career Development Award number 1IK2HX002567-01A1 from the VA Office of Research and Development. Dr. Jones is supported by grant number K08HS024569 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The funders had no rule in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. All authors receive some salary support from the Department of Veterans Affairs.