Towards a practical threat assessment methodology for crop landraces

Front Plant Sci. 2024 Feb 22:15:1336876. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1336876. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Crop landraces (LR), the traditional varieties of crops that have been maintained for millennia by repeated cycles of planting, harvesting, and selection, are genetically diverse compared to more modern varieties and provide one of the key components for crop improvement due to the ease of trait transfer within the crop species. However, LR diversity is increasingly threatened with genetic erosion and extinction by replacement with improved cultivars, lack of incentives for farmers to maintain traditional agricultural systems, and rising threats from climate change. Their active conservation is necessary to maintain this critical resource. However, as there are hundreds of thousands of LR and millions of LR populations for crops globally, active conservation is complex and resource-intensive. To assist in implementation, it is useful to be able to prioritise LR for conservation action and an obvious means of prioritisation is based on relative threat assessment. There have been several attempts to propose LR threat assessment methods, but none thus far has been widely accepted or applied. The aim of this paper is to present a novel, practical, standardised, and objective methodology for LR threat assessment derived from the widely applied IUCN Red Listing for wild species, involving the collation of time series information for LR population range, LR population trend, market, and farmer characteristics and LR context information. The collated information is compared to a set of threat criteria and an appropriate threat category is assigned to the LR when a threshold level is reached. The proposed methodology can be applied at national, regional, or global levels and any crop group.

Keywords: conservation; crop landraces; extinction; genetic erosion; methodology; plant genetic resources; threat assessment.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Partial research funding was provided by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union through the Networking, Partnerships, and Tools to Enhance in situ Conservation of European Plant Genetic Resources (Farmer’s Pride) project 774271. Costs for open-access publishing were funded by the University of Birmingham.