Comparative bonding performance of coronal dentin disks and CAD/CAM resin composite disks for biological restoration: The impact of resin-coating technique

Dent Mater J. 2024 Mar 29;43(2):303-311. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2023-229. Epub 2024 Mar 5.

Abstract

This study evaluated the bonding performance of coronal dentin disks, designed for biological restoration, and CAD/CAM resin composite disks when bonded to flat dentin surfaces using dual-cure resin cements, with and without a resin-coating (RC) technique. Three distinct groups were established within the non-RC group, each using one of the two types of resin cements in a self-adhesive mode: one-step self-etch adhesive (1-SEA) without light-cure, 1-SEA with light-cure, and a separate group using an alternate cement. Within the RC group, a subgroup was established for each cement. The microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of the disk-dentin beam was tested after 0 and 10,000 thermocycles in a 5°C/55°C. No significant μTBS difference was observed among the non-RC groups. However, when using RC, the μTBSs of coronal dentin disks significantly exceeded those of CAD/CAM resin composite disks. Thermocycle aging did not affect μTBS in any of the bonding methods, except in self-adhesive mode.

Keywords: Biological restoration; Indirect restoration; Microtensile bond strength; Resin cement; Resin-coating.

MeSH terms

  • Composite Resins / chemistry
  • Dental Bonding* / methods
  • Dental Cements
  • Dentin
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents / chemistry
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Materials Testing
  • Resin Cements* / chemistry
  • Tensile Strength

Substances

  • Resin Cements
  • Dental Cements
  • Composite Resins
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents
  • Glass Ionomer Cements