Automated volumetric evaluation of intracranial compartments and cerebrospinal fluid distribution on emergency trauma head CT scans to quantify mass effect

Front Neurosci. 2024 Feb 19:18:1341734. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1341734. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Intracranial space is divided into three compartments by the falx cerebri and tentorium cerebelli. We assessed whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) distribution evaluated by a specifically developed deep-learning neural network (DLNN) could assist in quantifying mass effect.

Methods: Head trauma CT scans from a high-volume emergency department between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Manual segmentations of intracranial compartments and CSF served as the ground truth to develop a DLNN model to automate the segmentation process. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the segmentation performance. Supratentorial CSF Ratio was calculated by dividing the volume of CSF on the side with reduced CSF reserve by the volume of CSF on the opposite side.

Results: Two hundred and seventy-four patients (mean age, 61 years ± 18.6) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) who had an emergency head CT scan were included. The average DSC for training and validation datasets were respectively: 0.782 and 0.765. Lower DSC were observed in the segmentation of CSF, respectively 0.589, 0.615, and 0.572 for the right supratentorial, left supratentorial, and infratentorial CSF regions in the training dataset, and slightly lower values in the validation dataset, respectively 0.567, 0.574, and 0.556. Twenty-two patients (8%) had midline shift exceeding 5 mm, and 24 (8.8%) presented with high/mixed density lesion exceeding >25 ml. Fifty-five patients (20.1%) exhibited mass effect requiring neurosurgical treatment. They had lower supratentorial CSF volume and lower Supratentorial CSF Ratio (both p < 0.001). A Supratentorial CSF Ratio below 60% had a sensitivity of 74.5% and specificity of 87.7% (AUC 0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.94) in identifying patients that require neurosurgical treatment for mass effect. On the other hand, patients with CSF constituting 10-20% of the intracranial space, with 80-90% of CSF specifically in the supratentorial compartment, and whose Supratentorial CSF Ratio exceeded 80% had minimal risk.

Conclusion: CSF distribution may be presented as quantifiable ratios that help to predict surgery in patients after TBI. Automated segmentation of intracranial compartments using the DLNN model demonstrates a potential of artificial intelligence in quantifying mass effect. Further validation of the described method is necessary to confirm its efficacy in triaging patients and identifying those who require neurosurgical treatment.

Keywords: automated segmentation; cerebrospinal fluid reserve; deep-learning neural network; intracranial compartments; mass effect; traumatic brain injury.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The research presented in this article was funded from the project “RADi – asystent radiologa,” co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund under the Smart Growth Operational Programme 2014–2020, Priority Axis “Support for R&D activities of enterprises,” Action 1.1 “R&D projects of enterprises,” Sub-measure 1.1.1 “Industrial research and development work carried out by enterprises.” The project provided financial support for the preparation of the deep-learning neural network and technical support necessary for the study.