A computationally informed distinction of interoception and exteroception

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Apr:159:105608. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105608. Epub 2024 Mar 2.

Abstract

While interoception is of major neuroscientific interest, its precise definition and delineation from exteroception continue to be debated. Here, we propose a functional distinction between interoception and exteroception based on computational concepts of sensor-effector loops. Under this view, the classification of sensory inputs as serving interoception or exteroception depends on the sensor-effector loop they feed into, for the control of either bodily (physiological and biochemical) or environmental states. We explain the utility of this perspective by examining the perception of skin temperature, one of the most challenging cases for distinguishing between interoception and exteroception. Specifically, we propose conceptualising thermoception as inference about the thermal state of the body (including the skin), which is directly coupled to thermoregulatory processes. This functional view emphasises the coupling to regulation (control) as a defining property of perception (inference) and connects the definition of interoception to contemporary computational theories of brain-body interactions.

Keywords: Allostatic control; Bayesian inference; Brain-body interactions; Generative model; Homeostatic control; Mental health; Sensor-effector loops; Thermoception.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Brain / physiology
  • Head
  • Humans
  • Interoception* / physiology
  • Personality