Impact of coexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus on the urinary microbiota of kidney stone patients

PeerJ. 2024 Feb 26:12:e16920. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16920. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) commonly complicates kidney stone disease (KSD). Our objective is to investigate the variations in the urinary microbiota between individuals with KSD alone and those with KSD plus T2DM. This exploration could have implications for disease diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Methods: During lithotripsy, a ureterscope was employed, and 1 mL of urine was collected from the renal pelvis after bladder disinfection. Sequencing targeting the V3-V4 hypervariable region was performed using the 16S rRNA and Illumina Novaseq platform.

Results: The Shannon index showed a significant decrease in the KSD plus T2DM group compared to the KSD-only group (false discovery rate = 0.041). Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) demonstrated a distinct bacterial community in the KSD plus T2DM group compared to the KSD-only group (false discovery rate = 0.027). The abundance of Sphingomonas, Corynebacterium, and Lactobacillus was significantly higher in the KSD plus T2DM group than in the KSD-only group (false discovery rate < 0.05). Furthermore, Enhydrobacter, Chryseobacterium, and Allobaculum were positively correlated with fasting blood glucose and HbA1c values (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The urinary microbiota in the renal pelvis exhibits differences between patients with KSD plus T2DM and those with KSD alone. Further studies employing animal models are necessary to validate these distinctions, potentially paving the way for therapeutic developments based on the urinary microbiota.

Keywords: Renal pelvis; Type 2 diabetic mellitus; Urinary microbiota; Kidney stone; Metabolic.

MeSH terms

  • Bacteria
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / complications
  • Humans
  • Kidney Calculi* / genetics
  • Microbiota*
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics

Substances

  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370777, 81874142 and 82073041), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LXR22H160001, and LY22H160011), and the Gusu Medical Talent Foundation (GSWS2020021). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.