Purpose: This study aimed to compare respiratory functions of patients after thoracoscopic lobectomy (TS) with those after thoracotomy (TR). Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in two centers, one of which adapted TS as a standard procedure in 2009 and the other performs it via TR. Data on patients who underwent lobectomy for congenital lung disease between 2009 and 2021 and underwent pulmonary function test (spirometry) were collected. Results: Ten patients underwent TS and 36 underwent TR. Distribution based on sex, prenatal diagnosis, pathological diagnosis, and resected lobe were similar between the two groups. The median [interquartile range] age at procedure in the TR group was significantly smaller than that in the TS group (13 [11-18] months versus 38 [13-79] months, P = .03). The procedure duration in the TR group was significantly shorter than that in the TS group (230 [171-264] minutes versus 264 [226-420] minutes, P = .02). Pulmonary function test was conducted at the age of eight in both groups, but the interval between the procedure, and the test was significantly shorter in the TS group (TR: 7 [5-8] years versus TS: 5 [2-7] years, P = .03). The ratio of forced vital capacity compared to predicted one (TR: 86.6 [76.6-95.3] versus TS: 88.7 [86.8-89.1], P = .58) and the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second against that predicted (TR: 84.0 [80.5-88.7] versus TS: 88.7 [86.8-89.1], P = .08) were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Although TR was performed earlier than TS, respiratory function was similar between the two groups.
Keywords: congenital lung malformation; lobectomy; respiratory function; thoracoscopy; thoracotomy.