Background: Currently, there is no universally accepted standard treatment for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) in children. We aimed to investigate the possible proper regimens and timing of treatment for pediatric OMG cases based on the clinical manifestations: OMG with ptosis only and OMG with other features.
Methods: One hundred and forty two OMG cases attended at the Department of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, from 2010 to 2019 were included, and information from medical records was reviewed and recorded. Comparisons of clinical characteristics between patients with OMG with ptosis only and patients with OMG with other features as well as between patients treated with glucocorticoid (GC) within or after six months from disease onset were performed.
Results: OMG with other features constituted about 54.9% of the cases, and 66.2% of the patients achieved optimal outcome. Patients with OMG with ptosis only responded to pyridostigmine alone more than patients with OMG with other features who required several therapies (P < 0.001). Patients with OMG with ptosis only had a larger proportion of optimal outcome than the patients with OMG with other features (P = 0.002), and the difference remained significant even when the individual outcome groups were compared (P < 0.001). Patients who received GC within six months had a greater proportion of optimal outcome than those who received it after six months (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Although OMG with other features is a more common subtype of OMG, it is also more severe than OMG with ptosis only. An earlier addition of GC leads to optimal outcome.
Keywords: Glucocorticoid; Ocular myasthenia gravis; Outcome; Ptosis; Treatment.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.