The efficacy and safety of non-surgical treatment of diabetic foot wound infections and ulcers: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of non-surgical treatments for diabetic foot ulcers and infections. After a rigorous literature review, seven studies were selected for detailed analysis. The findings demonstrate that non-surgical treatments significantly reduce wound infection rates (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -15.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-19.05, -11.25], p < 0.01) compared to surgical methods. Ulcer healing rates were found to be comparable between non-surgical and surgical approaches (SMD = 0.07, 95% CI: [-0.38, 0.51], p = 0.15). Importantly, the rate of amputations within 6 months post-treatment was significantly lower in the non-surgical group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.19, 95% CI: [0.09, 0.41], p < 0.01). Additionally, a lower mortality rate was observed in patients treated non-surgically (RR = 0.28, 95% CI: [0.13, 0.59], p < 0.01). These results affirm the effectiveness and safety of non-surgical interventions in managing diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting that they should be considered a viable option in diabetic foot care.

Keywords: amputation rate; diabetic foot ulcer; meta-analysis; non-surgical treatment; wound healing.