Formerly used defense sites on Unalaska Island, Alaska: Mapping a legacy of environmental pollution

Renee Jordan-Ward; Frank A von Hippel; Jennifer Schmidt; Marc P Verhougstraete

doi:10.1002/ieam.4902

Formerly used defense sites on Unalaska Island, Alaska: Mapping a legacy of environmental pollution

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Feb 14. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4902. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Renee Jordan-Ward¹, Frank A von Hippel², Jennifer Schmidt³, Marc P Verhougstraete²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
² Department of Community, Environment and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
³ Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

PMID: 38353343
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4902

Abstract

Unalaska Island, Alaska, served as a US military base during World War II. The military installed bases on Unalaska and nearby islands, many of which were built adjacent to Unangan communities. The military used toxic compounds in its operations and left a legacy of pollution that may pose health risks to residents and local wildlife. The goals of this study were to identify hotspots of contamination remaining at Unalaska formerly used defense (FUD) sites, evaluate the risk posed by arsenic, and examine "no US Department of Defense action indicated" (NDAI) status determinations for FUD sites near communities. We compiled soil chemistry data from remediation reports prepared by the US Army Corps of Engineers at 18 FUD sites on and near Unalaska. Nine had past and/or active remediation projects and on-site sampling data. Eight sites did not have sampling data and were characterized as NDAI. One site was listed as closed. For the nine sites with sampling data, we compiled data for 22 contaminants of concern (COC) and compared concentrations to soil cleanup levels for human health (18 AAC 75.341). We mapped contaminant concentrations exceeding these levels to identify hotspots of contamination. We found that concentrations of some of the 22 COC exceeded Alaska cleanup levels despite remediation efforts, including diesel range organics, arsenic, and lead. The highest COC concentrations were at the FUD site adjacent to the City of Unalaska. A quantitative risk assessment for arsenic found that the risk of exposure through drinking water is low. We highlight concerns with NDAI designations and current remedial practices at remote FUD sites located adjacent to communities. Our data suggest the need for further remediation and monitoring efforts on Unalaska for certain contaminants and research to examine potential threats to human and animal health associated with these sites. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;00:1-12. © 2024 SETAC.

Keywords: Arctic pollution; Army Corps of Engineers; Health risk evaluations; Military contamination; Risk assessment.

Abstract

Grants and funding