Centering Health Equity in the Implementation of the Hospital Incident Command System: A Qualitative Case Comparison Study

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024 Feb 14:18:e44. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2024.20.

Abstract

Objective: Disasters exacerbate inequities in health care. Health systems use the Hospital Incident Command System (HICS) to plan and coordinate their disaster response. This study examines how 2 health systems prioritized equity in implementing the Hospital Incident Command System (HICS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and identifies factors that influenced implementation.

Methods: This is a qualitative case comparison study, involving semi-structured interviews with 29 individuals from 2 US academic health systems. Strategies for promoting health equity were categorized by social determinants of health. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided analysis using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

Results: The health systems used various strategies to incorporate health equity throughout implementation, addressing all 5 social determinants of health domains. Facilitators included HICS principles, external partnerships, community relationships, senior leadership, health equity experts and networks, champions, equity-stratified data, teaming, and a culture of health equity. Barriers encompassed clarity of the equity representative role, role ambiguity for equity representatives, tokenism, competing priorities, insufficient resource allocation, and lack of preparedness.

Conclusions: These findings elucidate how health systems centered equity during HICS implementation. Health systems and regulatory bodies can use these findings as a foundation to revise the HICS and move toward a more equitable disaster response.

Keywords: COVID-19; Hospital Incident Command System; health equity; implementation.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Disasters*
  • Health Equity*
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Qualitative Research