The Accuracy of Intraoral Registration for Dynamic Surgical Navigation in the Edentulous Maxilla

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Feb 13;0(0). doi: 10.11607/jomi.10531. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the high clinical accuracy of dynamic navigation, inherent sources of error exist. The purpose of this study was to improve the accuracy of dynamic navigated surgical procedures in the edentulous maxilla by identifying the optimal configuration of intra-oral points that results in the lowest possible registration error for direct clinical implementation.

Materials and methods: Six different 4-area configurations were tested by 3 operators against positive and negative controls (8-areas and 3-areas, respectively) using a skull model. The two dynamic navigation systems (X-Guide® and NaviDent®) and the two registration methods (bone surface tracing and fiducial markers) produced four registration groups. The accuracy of the registration was checked at the frontal process of the zygoma. Intra- and inter- operator reliability for each registration group were reported. Multiple comparisons were conducted to find the best configuration with the minimum registration error.

Results: Ranking revealed one configuration in the tracing groups (Conf.3) and two configurations in the fiducial groups (Conf.3 and Conf.5) that had the best accuracy. When the inferior surfaces of the zygomatic buttress were excluded, fiducial registration produced better accuracy with both systems (p 0.006 and <0.0001). However, tracing 1 cm areas at these surfaces bilaterally resulted in similar registration accuracy as placing fiducial markers there (p 0.430 and 0.237). NaviDent® performed generally better (p 0.049, 0.001 and 0.002) albeit having a wider margin of uncertainty in the obtained values. Changing the distribution of the 4 tracing areas or fiducial markers had a less pronounced effect with X-Guide® than with the NaviDent® system.

Conclusion: For edentulous maxillary surgeries, 4 fiducial markers placed according to configuration 3 or 5 result in the lowest registration error. Where implants are being placed bilaterally, an additional 2 sites may reduce the error further. For bilateral zygomatic implant placement, it is optimal to place 2 fiducials on the inferior surfaces of the maxillary tuberosities, other 2 on their buccal surfaces, and 2 on the anterior labial surface of the alveolar bone. Utilising the inferior zygomatic buttress is recommended over the inferior maxillary tuberosities in other types of maxillary surgeries.

Keywords: Dynamic Navigation; Fiducial; Implants; Maxilla; Registration; Tracing.