Alpha-diversity indices are an essential tool for describing and comparing biodiversity. Microbial ecologists apply indices originally intended for, or adopted by, macroecology to address questions relating to taxonomy (conserved marker) and function (metagenome-based data). In this Perspective piece, I begin by discussing the nature and mathematical quirks important for interpreting routinely employed alpha-diversity indices. Secondly, I propose a metagenomic alpha-diversity index (MD) that measures the (dis)similarity of protein-encoding genes within a community. MD has defined limits, whereby a community comprised mostly of similar, poorly diverse protein-encoding genes pulls the index to the lower limit, while a community rich in divergent homologs and unique genes drives it toward the upper limit. With data acquired from an in silico and three in situ metagenome studies, I derive MD and typical alpha-diversity indices applied to taxonomic (ribosomal rRNA) and functional (all protein-encoding) genes, and discuss their relationships with each other. Not all alpha-diversity indices detect biological trends, and taxonomic does not necessarily follow functional biodiversity. Throughout, I explain that protein Richness and MD provide complementary and easily interpreted information, while probability-based indices do not. Finally, considerations regarding the unique nature of microbial metagenomic data and its relevance for describing functional biodiversity are discussed.
Keywords: Theoretical ecology; biodiversity ecosystem function; microbial ecology; statistical ecology.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.