Objective: We sought to determine whether average cumulated time to chart closure (CTCC), a novel construct to measure clinician workload burden, and electronic health record (EHR) measures were associated with a validated measure of burnout.
Materials and methods: Physicians at a large academic institution participated in a well-being survey that was linked to their EHR use data. CTCC was defined as the average time from the start of patient encounters to chart closure over a set of encounters. Established EHR use measures including daily total time in the EHR (EHR-Time8), time in the EHR outside scheduled hours, work outside of work (WOW8), and time spent on inbox (IB-Time8) were calculated. We examined the relationship between CTCC, EHR use metrics, and burnout using descriptive statistics and adjusted logistic regression models.
Results: We included data from 305 attendings, encompassing 242 432 ambulatory encounters (2021). Among them, 42% (128 physicians) experienced burnout. The median CTCC for all clinicians was 32.5 h. Unadjusted analyses revealed significant associations between CTCC, WOW8, IB-Time8, and burnout. In a final adjusted model, only CTCC remained statistically significant with an odds ratio estimate of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.00-2.01).
Discussion: These results suggest that CTCC is predictive of burnout and that purely measuring duration of interaction with the EHR itself is not sufficient to capture burnout.
Conclusion: Workload burden as manifested by average CTCC has the potential to be a practical, quantifiable measure that will allow for identification of clinicians at risk of burnout and to assess the success of interventions designed to address burnout.
Keywords: burnout; documentation burden; electronic health records; physician wellbeing.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.