Consumers or Patients? Medical Device Recipients under Australian Law Straddle Two Worlds

J Law Med. 2023 Dec;30(3):572-592.

Abstract

This article analyses the status of medical device recipients under Australian law. The 2021 Gill v Ethicon Sàrl litigation in the Federal Court of Australia has brought the issue to the fore. Moving from the Court's findings, the article dissects the specific vulnerability of medical device recipients and explores the under-researched distinction between patients and consumers under Australian law. The analysis spans the regulatory landscape for medical devices prior to marketing approval, the statutory protections and causes of actions available to consumers under the Australian Consumer Law, and the safeguards for patients developed under medical law (particularly medical negligence). In addition to doctrinal clarifications, the article provides a discussion of key policy considerations that frame the various regimes. Patients and consumers share characteristics, but their legal protections differ in terms of focus and objectives. Medical device recipients straddle both worlds, requiring the highest levels of care and disclosure.

Keywords: consumer law; consumers; medical devices; medical negligence; patients.

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Disclosure
  • Humans
  • Malpractice*